SurfaceArt

SurfaceArt - whites' painters writings [Hardstractism]
1. I would not know how to tell it in Italian... arte di superficie? It would be well us Superficial but it already exists or something of the kind has existed and it is not what him it intends here.
SurfaceArt is painting and other multidimensional expressions lthat doesn't stupidly lose themselves in the technical imitation of the reality, rather they simulate the formalities of demonstration of it, the onset of the phenomenon, the expression of the existence. In this perspective it is the game, wicked and marvelous together, of the perception that has a lot of levels of depth that depend on a certain propensity to approach to the reality. Way of living is to also learn to live and to install us in this world. To go in the depths and in the ravines is to slip well from the surface, from the peak, spring board, base of departure. Surface and fund coincide and they are not separate that from lower case letters crumbs of endless meanfull. And it is really in this de-scalation that the emergency of the being recognizes, the subject that he does under our eyes. The artist is the one that more who risks him in this excursion in the sense and in the ethos of the things. No fear. The works of art are very lighter than this meat that am forming into a ball. I hope to succeed in gathering here some artist that better of me he succeeds in explaining with to act poetic the spirit of the SurfaceArt. For now it is everything. (candidacies are accepted and you gatecrash!)
Ivan

2. I forgot. The SurfaceArt doesn't hide to be painting or words or other poetic material. The painted Surface is what is, I mix of signs, manipulation, doesn't represent out something of itself. At the most of its shine is inspired of it, but it makes only its same places. This way the SurfaceArtist doesn't have fear of the troublesome sounds and his word it doesn't simulate the nature but it is the same sound of the poetry. The SurfaceArtist is not afraid to show the clots of color or the brushstrokes, but it goes from there fierce. Don't worry him about the artifices "realistic" but it deals him with the chromatic cacophonies without taking around anybody with contained to effect.

3. in the "preferred" of Ivan Favale (who writes) there are examples (them despite) of SurfaceArt, that is "Spazialista" (art of space) and informal, the white's lover as color and concept of departure, from the simple thoughts to those complexes.

4. The SurfaceArt is for the pure ones, children immediately understand it and they make sense of it.

5. SurfaceArt can seem snob but instead it is simple and cleaning up.

6. SurfaceArt is slightly Achrome,
but we don't have problems with the color, only that we dirty it to personalize and we don't use it in academic way.

Ivan Favale